{"id":14054,"date":"2021-05-19T22:27:37","date_gmt":"2021-05-20T05:27:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cafe.foundation\/blog\/?p=14054"},"modified":"2021-05-19T22:27:37","modified_gmt":"2021-05-20T05:27:37","slug":"two-batteries-china-harvard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/cafe.foundation\/blog\/two-batteries-china-harvard\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Cutting Edge Batteries \u2013 How Soon?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hope reigns eternal for those tracking battery developments.\u00a0 But for once, or even twice, there may be a glimmer of hope with two cutting edge batteries.\u00a0 Researchers at Zhejiang University in China and Harvard University in America report promising numbers for very approaches, as divergent as their geographical locations.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em>Ultrafast All-climate Aluminum-graphene Battery with Quarter-million Cycle Life<\/strong><\/h4>\n

R<\/strong>esearchers at the verbosely named MOE Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Adsorption and Separation Materials and Technologies of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, announced their extreme long-life battery under the almost equally verbose title shown above.<\/p>\n

The journal Science Advances<\/em><\/a> published the research team\u2019s paper in its December 15, 2017 issue, making one wonder why it\u2019s only now being noted in publications here.<\/p>\n

The abstract for the paper reports remarkably high charge retention after a quarter million cycles and what would seem abusive \u201cfolding.\u201d\u00a0 \u201cRechargeable aluminum-ion batteries are promising in high-power density but still face critical challenges of limited lifetime, rate capability, and cathodic capacity. We design a \u201ctrihigh tricontinuous\u201d (3H3C) graphene film cathode with features of high quality, orientation, and channeling for local structures (3H) and continuous electron-conducting matrix, ion-diffusion highway, and electroactive mass for the whole electrode (3C). Such a cathode retains high specific capacity of around 120 mAh g\u22121at ultrahigh current density of 400 A g\u22121 (charged in 1.1 s) with 91.7% retention after 250,000 cycles, surpassing all the previous batteries in terms of rate capability and cycle life. The assembled aluminum-graphene battery works well within a wide temperature range of \u221240 to 120\u00b0C with remarkable flexibility bearing 10,000 times of folding, promising for all-climate wearable energy devices. This design opens an avenue for\u2026 future super-batteries.\u201d<\/p>\n

The idea of a battery lasting a quarter-million cycles and retaining almost 92 percent of its capacity is astonishing compared to the 500 to 2,000 cycles with 80-percent retention most batteries demonstrate.<\/p>\n

Finding a way to make an aluminum-ion battery function all that well has been blocked up to this point, though.\u00a0 The anode usually demonstrated excellent performance, but cathodes were weak electrically.\u00a0 Researchers found a graphene film (trihigh tricontinuous or 3H3C) design that could be formed into nano-channels could enable the flow of electrolytes and ions.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

(A<\/strong>) Illustration of tricontinuous (3C, continuous electron conductor, continuous ion-conducting channel, and continuous active material) and trihigh (3H, high-quality graphene, high-orientation assembling, and high channeling) design for a desired graphene cathode. (B<\/strong>) Photograph of GO and rGO films. (C<\/strong>) Photograph of as-prepared silvery GF-HC maintaining its original integrity.<\/p><\/div>\n

Performance is high, even when the pouch cells were folded in half over 10,000 times.\u00a0 This makes the GF-HC battery a good candidate for wearable energy storage. \u00a0Charge and discharge capacity remain remarkably stable even after a quarter-million cycles.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

(A<\/strong>) Comparison of specific capacities between GF-HC and GF-p cathodes at 6 A g\u22121<\/sup>. (B<\/strong>) Overlapped charge\/discharge curves of the GF-HC cathode at different cycles, exhibiting two charging plateaus of 1.7 to 2.3 V and 2.3 to 2.5 V and two discharge plateaus of 2.3 to 2.0 V and 2.0 to 1.5 V, which correspond well with cyclic voltammetry in fig. S10. (C<\/strong>) In situ XRD results of fully charged GF-HC, GF-p, and fully discharged GF-HC cathodes. (D<\/strong>) Stable specific capacities of the GF-HC cathode at ultrahigh current densities from 10 to 200 A g\u22121<\/sup>\u00a0and (E<\/strong>) corresponding charge\/discharge curves. (F<\/strong>) Stable cycling performance of the GF-HC cathode at current density of 100 A g\u22121<\/sup>\u00a0within 250,000 cycles. (G<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0H<\/strong>) Comparison of rate capability and cycle life characteristics between the GF-HC cathode and various research results. Legends of (H) are also listed in (G). Detailed data are listed in table S1 (1<\/em><\/a>,\u00a02<\/em><\/a>,\u00a04<\/em><\/a>,\u00a07<\/em><\/a>,\u00a08<\/em><\/a>,\u00a015<\/em><\/a>,\u00a016<\/em><\/a>,\u00a033<\/em><\/a>\u201348<\/em><\/a>). (I<\/strong>) Comparison of the energy\/power density of Al-GB with multiple commercialized energy storage technologies and various research results (49).<\/em><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

Harvard\u2019s Solid State Battery<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Harvard researchers built a bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwich of a battery \u2013 at least that\u2019s how the school\u2019s Gazette <\/em>describes it.<\/a>\u00a0 Researchers describe it this way.<\/a>\u00a0 \u201cOur multilayer design has the structure of a less-stable electrolyte sandwiched between more-stable solid electrolytes, which prevents any lithium dendrite growth through well localized decompositions in the less stable electrolyte layer. A mechanism analogous to the expansion screw effect is proposed, whereby any cracks are filled by dynamically generated decompositions that are also well constrained, probably by the \u2018anchoring\u2019 effect the decompositions induce.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

The Gazette<\/em> expands on its description of what goes on in the battery.\u00a0 \u201cThe first electrolyte (chemical name Li5.5PS4.5Cl1.5\u00a0or LPSCI) is more stable with lithium but prone to dendrite penetration. The second electrolyte, (Li10Ge1P2S12\u00a0or LGPS) is less stable with lithium but appears immune to dendrites. In this design, dendrites are allowed to grow through the graphite and first electrolyte but are stopped when they reach the second. In other words, the dendrites grow through the lettuce and tomato but stop at the bacon. The bacon barrier stops the dendrites from pushing through and shorting the battery.\u201d<\/p>\n

The illustration helps visualize matters, but makes one wonder about the analogy.\u00a0 If dendrites (teeth-like projections) can pierce the first piece of bread, the first layers of lettuce and tomato, but stop at the bacon, is it possible to eat the sandwich?\u00a0 Coming from either side, the bacon would be impervious.\u00a0 It\u2019s great for batteries, anyway.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

A BLT battery. First comes the bread \u2014 the lithium metal anode \u2014 followed by lettuce \u2014 a coating of graphite. Next, a layer of tomatoes \u2014 the first electrolyte \u2014 and a layer of bacon \u2014 the second electrolyte. Finish it off with another layer of tomatoes and the last piece of bread \u2014 the cathode. Credit: Lisa Burrows\/Harvard SEAS (John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences)<\/p><\/div>\n

While not as long-lived as Zhejiang University\u2019s battery, the Harvard cell is sufficient for all practical purposes.\u00a0 the Li-metal anode paired with a LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 (lithium, nickel, manganese, carbon) cathode is very stable, retaining 82-percent of its charge after 10,000 cycles at 20C.\u00a0 Oddly enough, at a lower 1.5C rate, the battery keeps only 81.3-percent capacity after only 2,000 cycles.\u00a0 (10,000 cycles would allow a full charge-discharge cycle every day for over 27 years.)<\/p>\n

Performance at the micro-meter-sized cathode level is great, with a specific power of 110.6 kilowatts per kilogram and a specific energy of up to 631.1 Watt-hours per kilogram.\u00a0 One wonders what the numbers will be at real-world scale.<\/p>\n

A paper on the work, \u201cdynamic stability design strategy for lithium metal solid state batteries,\u201d is published in the journal Nature<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0 Even the abstract is highly detailed.<\/p>\n

A solid-state electrolyte is expected to suppress lithium (Li) dendrite penetration with high mechanical strength. \u00a0However, in practice it still remains challenging to realize a lithium metal anode for batteries, because micrometer- or submicrometer-sized cracks in ceramic pellets can frequently be generated during battery assembly or long-time cycling. Once cracks form, lithium dendrite penetration is inevitable. Here we describe a solid-state battery design with a hierarchy of interface stabilities (to lithium metal responses), to achieve an ultrahigh current density with no lithium dendrite penetration. Our multilayer design has the structure of a less-stable electrolyte sandwiched between more-stable solid electrolytes, which prevents any lithium dendrite growth through well localized decompositions in the less stable electrolyte layer. A mechanism analogous to the expansion screw effect is proposed, whereby any cracks are filled by dynamically generated decompositions that are also well constrained, probably by the \u2018anchoring\u2019 effect the decompositions induce. The cycling performance of the lithium metal anode paired with a LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 cathode is very stable, with an 82 per cent capacity retention after 10,000 cycles at a 20C rate (8.6 milliamps per centimeter squared) and 81.3 per cent capacity retention after 2,000 cycles at\u00a0a 1.5C\u00a0rate (0.64\u00a0milliamps per centimeter squared). Our design also enables a specific power of 110.6 kilowatts per kilogram and specific energy up to 631.1 watt hours per kilogram at the micrometer-sized cathode material level.<\/em><\/p>\n

Not Ready for Prime Time<\/h4>\n

Note that neither battery is anywhere near production, both being at the laboratory phase.\u00a0 Both, however, show promise for the future.\u00a0 How far in the future is unknown.<\/p>\n